NCAA Division I Schools at it Again

 

An article on this blog a few days ago mentioned that some 125 Division I Schools had petitioned the NCAA to reconsider its August 2011 decision to allow those schools to pay student-athletes an extra $2,000 per year as part of their scholarships in football and basketball.

Now it seems that some 75 school have also petitioned the NCAA to review the decision reached at the same time this past summer to allow schools to make scholarship offers good for 4 years instead of the one-year scholarships now offered that are subject to review annually.

The proposed reforms will now be reviewed by the Division I Board of Directors at its upcoming January meeting.  Both proposals were supported by university presidents and by NCAA President, Mark Emmert.

“The NCAA and presidents step up with this legislation and then they vote it down,” said Christian Dennie in interview with The Chronicle of Higher Education).a former compliance officer at Missouri and Oklahoma who now practices law in Ft. Worth, Texas, and writes a blog on NCAA oversight comment made

“They say ‘We don’t have enough money,’ and then the football coach gets a $2 million raise,” Dennie added, speaking in general terms without naming any specific school.  “It’s really a resource allocation issue.”

It appears that the representatives of many NCAA member schools talk about reform and concern for the welfare of student-athletes; but then balk at actually taking any concrete action.  Perhaps what should be revisited is the idea that athletic departments are independent entities within a university who operate outside of the normal system of checks and balances.

In the end the problem may be simple.  Paul “Bear” Bryant was once asked in an interview how did he feel about football coaches being paid so well as compared to faculty members on campus.  He replied that no one ever paid money to listen to a chemistry professor lecture.  The harsh reality on college campuses is that a great number of students and fans are much more concerned with the success of their football and basketball teams than they are of their school’s  academic rank.

 

 

5 Comments

  1. Carpet Cleaning Miami Fl December 31, 2011 at 8:03 am

    Yeah, that’s great news and awesome informative post, thanks for sharing such a reality with us, hoping to read more from you.

     
  2. Connier Nordan January 2, 2012 at 6:58 pm

    How many in society are willing to make sacrifices for principal over money, objects. Would you lower your standard of living, because this is what it all comes down to just on a different scale. People are unhappy and look to the external for happiness. Until they look within themselves, leadership will be poor and misguided, leading to an endless loop and demised future. People’s EIQ has been relegated through sports and we talk about how the internet affects youth of today, what about adults and their worship of sports, the worship of money? Education, knowledge, and self-love will give us leaders and a productive and effective society. These Presidents are much like many leaders, Pseudo-leaders playing a game themselves with an altered sense of reality. Leaders do what is best for society and future, not their system of job and money, self-interest. There’s a sickness going around and it has brought the best to their knees and crumbled nations, just when they thought they would manipulate everyone for their advantage.

     
  3. StudentAthleteRights January 9, 2012 at 7:19 pm

    Sports advocates should know that the 2K and multi-year scholarship proposals were more about public relations and less about student-athlete well-being. Get involved visit studentathleteshumanrights.com.

     
  4. StudentAthleteRights January 9, 2012 at 7:23 pm

    The 2k and multi-year scholarship proposal was more about public relations and less about student-athlete well-being. Get involved visit http://studentathleteshumanrightsproject.com

     
  5. Jeff Wagner March 6, 2012 at 3:39 pm

    “Bear” Bryant is exactly correct.  Sports are the most prominent marketing arm for colleges.  An extra $2,000 a year is books, lab fees, etc. in many universities.  Adding a 4 year time frame to this will also (hopefully) prevent students from transferring to another university in hopes of a better deal.  Since the precedent has already been set, it needs to be uniform across Division I and Division II schools as well as smaller schools.  Making these funds available as a scholarship also ties it to grades as most scholarships are contingent on getting good grades. 

     

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *