ASADA Suffers 20 Percent Cut in Anti-Doping Budget Ahead of Rio 2016
Anti-doping efforts in Australia have suffered a blow just over two months before the start of the Rio 2016 Olympic Games after the country’s National Anti-Doping Agency confirmed its budget had been slashed by 20 percent.
The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) have been forced to admit the cuts have had an effect on their operations as this year’s Games edge closer.
It has been reported that AUS$1.4 million (£688,000/$1 million/€905,000) had been allocated by the Government for enhanced testing in the lead-up to the 2018 Gold Coast Commonwealth Games.
The news comes at a time where a series of doping scandals have pierced a hole through world sport, including recent allegations of major-scale cover-ups and sample switching at the Sochi 2014 Winter Olympic Games.
A total of 55 adverse findings have been uncovered from the Beijing 2008 and London 2012 Games following retests conducted by the International Olympic Committee.
“In the financial year ending 2014, ASADA had a total of 78 staff – by 2017, this will drop to 50,” ASADA told ABC.
“This has had impacts across all of ASADA’s functions, including our testing, investigative, education and administrative units.”
Australia has faced several notable doping problems in recent years, including the scandal surrounding Australian Football League club Essendon, whose record of 16 Premiership titles is the best in the sport’s history.
A total of 34 past and present players for the team have failed drugs tests.
The case was born out of an investigation in February 2013 by the Australian Crime Commission, which released the Organised Crime and Drugs in Sport report alleging widespread doping in Australian sport.
As a result, in June 2014, the ASADA initiated action against the players, via the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal, alleging doping through the use of the banned peptide Thymosin Beta-4.
Last March, the AFL Anti-Doping Tribunal ruled there was insufficient evidence to find the players guilty of offences arising from the club’s controversial 2012 supplements programme.
The World Anti-Doping Agency then appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, which was upheld.
Catherine Ordway, a sports lawyer who worked for ASADA for two years prior to 2008, admitted the Essendon situation had stretched the organisation’s resources, while a Government spokesperson claims numbers of staff have been reduced because the case was coming to an end.
“The last couple of years must have been really been extremely difficult for ASADA to manage given the limited resources and the turnover of staff they’ve had during that period,” she told ABC.
“ASADA has been under siege and undoubtedly feels like been under siege since the Essendon matter was thrust upon them.”
The development follows ASADA claiming they had conducted what it describes as the “most rigorous” anti-doping programme of any Australian Olympic team to date.
By Liam Morgan
Republished with permission from insidethegames.biz