Home Ethics Legal USOC, USA Gymnastics Under Fire at Senate Hearing over Nassar Case

USOC, USA Gymnastics Under Fire at Senate Hearing over Nassar Case

USOC, USA Gymnastics Under Fire at Senate Hearing over Nassar Case
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., front left, and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, front right, turn to applaud athletes survivors of abuse during a Senate Commerce subcommittee hearing on "Strengthening and Empowering U.S. Amateur Athletes," on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, July 24, 2018. Photo: AP Photo/Susan Walsh

By James Diamond |

United States Senators have questioned the sincerity of reforms introduced by the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and USA Gymnastics (USAG) following the Larry Nassar sex abuse scandal after both organizations made court filings trying to absolve themselves of responsibility.

Last Friday (July 20) the USOC filed a motion in court to be removed as a defendant in lawsuits filed by gymnasts Aly Raisman, Jordyn Wieber and McKayla Maroney, arguing that it holds no legal responsibility for Nassar’s actions.

USAG also filed papers for a different lawsuit claiming the same thing, seemingly arguing that because Nassar volunteered for and was not on the payroll, it was also, therefore, not responsible for his actions.

Hundreds of women and girls have accused Nassar of abuse during his time working at Michigan State University and USAG, with him now serving up to 175 years in prison.

Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal suggested in this latest Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation hearing that the OSOC and USAG showed poor morals by filing their respective motions.

“There are all kinds of defenses the parties can make, but there is also a moral responsibility here,” he said.

“If you’re serious and sincere, you will withdraw [the court filings].

“You need to be part of the legal solution, not just come here and apologize.”

When USAG was pushed on whether it truly felt Nassar never worked for them in a way that would make it legally responsible, president and chief executive Kerry Perry appeared to backtrack.

“What I’m saying is that he was not an employee of USA Gymnastics,” she said.

“Of course, as the team doctor, there was definitely a relationship there with USA Gymnastics.”

Blumenthal was quick to point out that USAG’s court fillings seem to contradict that admission.

Raising this point he said: “I would look at it really hard, and I would decide – and I’m being very serious – whether your organisation really wants to stand by that representation, [that they have no responsibility].”

The Interim President of Michigan State University John Engler also received criticism, for insensitive emails and comments he made during negotiations that eventually led to a $500 million settlement for victims abused at the university.

In April, Engler wrote an email in which he said the first woman to publicly accuse Nassar, Rachael Denhollander, was likely to get a “kickback” from her lawyer for her role in the “manipulation” of survivors.

He was also questioned about a conversation with one victim Kaylee Lorincz, in which Lorincz claims he asked her if she would accept a check for $250,000.

Democratic Senator Maggie Hassan suggested he had “some repair work to do…to put it mildly.”

It all comes as the group Olympians Rising, a campaign group calling for reform, released a scathing statement attacking the USOC for appointing Sarah Hirshland as chief executive.

In their statement, in which they call the USOC “a modern-day house of cards,” they claimed Hirshland is not qualified to take on the role and call her appointment, “another slap in the face to all Olympians, athletes, coaches and citizens who care about the health of the Olympic Movement.”

Hirshland previously worked at the United States Golf Association as chief commercial officer.

She has also come under criticism after it emerged she refused to speak to triple Olympic gold medalist Raisman after the hearing.

It is reported she later emailed Raisman to apologize, calling the situation a “misunderstanding.”

Republished with permission from insidethegames.biz


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.