Home Ethics Gender Issues

U.S. Team Threatens to Boycott Women’s Ice Hockey Championship over Pay Dispute

400
0
Meghan Duggan works out during the US Women's Olympic hockey team practice at the Belmont Hill School. Thursday, January 23, 2014. Boston Herald photo by John Wilcox.

Defending champion United States has threatened to boycott their home World Women’s Ice Hockey Championship in Plymouth later this month due to a row over wages.

The US team has won the last three titles at the International Ice Hockey Federation (IIHF) sanctioned event, but they are set to decline the opportunity to defend their crown following a dispute with USA Hockey.

The tournament at the USA Hockey Arena in Michigan is scheduled to run from March 31 to April 7.

Several players, including captain Meghan Duggan tweeted a link to a statement today, under a title which read: “US WNT will not play in the World Championship due to stalled negotiations over fair wages and support from USA Hockey.”

The women’s team are attempting to secure fair wages and support equal to the men’s program.

Law firm Ballard Spahr are reportedly representing the women’s side and have cited the Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act as a reason for their grievance.

It “requires USA Hockey to provide equitable support and encouragement for participation by women where, as is the case with hockey, separate programs for male and female athletes are conducted on a national basis,” according to the firm.

“The members of the US women’s national hockey team announce that we will not be playing in the 2017 IIHF Women’s World Championship in Plymouth, Michigan unless significant progress has been made on the year-long negotiations with USA Hockey over fair wages and equitable support,” the statement read.

“We have asked USA Hockey for equitable support as requited by the Ted Stevens Amateur Sports Act.

“Specifically, we have asked for equitable support in the areas of financial compensation, youth team development, equipment, travel expenses, hotel accommodations, meals, staffing, transportation, marketing and publicity.

“The goals of our requests are to achieve fair treatment from USA Hockey, to initiate the appropriate steps to correct the outlined issues, and to move forward with a shared goal of promoting and growing girls and women in our sport while representing the United States in future competitions, including the Women’s World Championship.

“Putting on the USA jersey represents the culmination of many years of hard work and sacrifice that reflect our love of both hockey and country.

“In making these requests, we are simply asking for USA Hockey to comply with the law.”

Two-time Olympic silver medalist Hilary Knight told the Chicago Tribune that the players were aware of the severity of the issue and the impact their decision might have.

“We’ve been asking for equitable support for over a year now,” said Knight.

“It sort of seemed like the stars were aligning and this is the right time to do it.

“We have a great group of leadership and great player pool.

“Obviously, before World Championships on home soil, it’s a big deal.”

Their boycott threat is not likely to affect their participation at next year’s Winter Olympic Games in Pyeongchang as they have already qualified, although they could feasibly decide not to travel to the South Korean resort if the impasse with USA Hockey continues.

The move represents a similar scenario to the women’s national football side threatening not to compete at last year’s Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro.

They eventually agreed to take part but suffered a shock quarter-final defeat at the hands of eventual silver medalists Sweden.

The US team has been drawn in Group A, along with Canada, who they have beaten in the previous three gold medal matches, Russia and Finland at the IIHF World Women’s Ice Hockey Championship.

By Liam Morgan

Republished with permission from insidethegames.biz

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here