Home Pro Boxing

Hubbard: Why Fury is Right to Take a Walk on the Wilder Side

786
0
Tyson Fury and Deontay Wilder pose in the ring at Windsor Park after the former’s victory over Francesco Pianeta. Photo: Belfast Telegraph

By Alan Hubbard |

It is the question on every fight fan’s lips, and is certainly the one I am asked most frequently whenever I talk boxing with my mates.

Can Tyson Fury really dethrone Deontay Wilder and claim the World Boxing Council (WBC) world heavyweight crown after only two lukewarm-up contests following a near three year absence from the ring?

I confess I don’t know. I am unashamedly fence-sitting on this one but what I do know is that I wouldn’t put anything past the cantankerous Gypsy King.

Ignore the “fake news” being put about by those that Fury’s British promoter Frank Warren terms “green-eyed monsters”, to the effect that the blockbuster bout won’t happen.

Both Wilder and Fury insist that it is on. “One hundred per cent,” says Warren, who has secured the most intriguing, contrasting fistic collision of styles for exclusive screening in the United Kingdom by BT Sport, who are now going shoulder to shoulder with Sky in the pay-per-view battle.

It is a massive ask for even a slimmed-down Fury, who has shed around 10 stone since his enforced lay-off because of a contested drugs ban, to overcome the thunder-punching spindly-legged American on his home patch later this year.

But then, I did not give Fury a hope in hell of beating Wladimir Klitschko in Germany three years ago, when he confounded us all and in the end we were left with more egg on our faces than the Ukrainian had blood on his.

Wilder is a much taller order, not so much physically but in terms of destructive power. Fury has never faced anyone who hits more venomously.

True, Klitschko could punch but his attacking technique was predictable. Fury never allowed Wladimir’s fists near his face, having it away on his toes whenever the long-standing champion cocked those mighty mitts.

Wilder, however, comes at you like a gale-driven windmill, his roundhouse punches smashing through the most impervious of guards, as one-round victim Audley Harrison and the 39 others he has dispatched with terrifying ruthlessness since turning pro after winning a bronze medal in the Beijing 2008 Olympics will testify.

Fury says he will have to catch him first but for all his skilled footwork he can be vulnerable. His backside is no stranger to the canvas.

He has been deposited there several times in sparring and in his 21st pro fight by a light-heavyweight, Steve Cunningham, although on that occasion he did get up to win.

As a subscriber to Boxing News, 30-year-old Fury doubtless would have found the piece last week by another giant British heavyweight, the 6ft 6in Richard Towers, of considerable interest.

Towers has sparred with just about every heavyweight of note, including Wilder, Fury and current multi-belted world and Olympic champion Anthony Joshua.

Wilder, he says, hits harder than them all, harder than Joshua and “eight times harder than Fury”.

He reckons Wilder has a type of power he has never experienced from any other heavyweight. “It felt like a horse kicking me,” he said.

He adds: “No disrespect to Tyson, but I have to be honest and in my opinion this is the wrong type of fight to take right now. It really is.”

Well, we shall see.

In boxing, when opportunity knocks you take it, and Fury seems the sort of fighter who, when thrown in at the deep end, resurfaces smelling of roses.

Fury is adamant that he is up for it.

I can see why. He happens to be the most unorthodox boxer in Britain – if not the world – with a style that may not require the full rigours of actual combat to get into shape.

His gym work and sparring might well provide all the fitness and psyche he needs to be in the sort of mental and physical condition to re-acquire the nous and ring-craft he employed to bewitch and befuddle Klitschko back in late 2015.

It has always been my view that the Fury who out thought, outfought and outfoxed Wlad would beat Wilder and Joshua too.

But time and history may be against him now. We do not know how much of that fabulous Fury is left.

Muhammad Ali tried something similar nearly 50 years ago and failed.

After being in exile for three years and seven months, he came back and stopped two top-ten fighters – Jerry Quarry and Oscar Bonavena.

The Greatest, five months after coming back, thought he was ready to take back his title from Joe Frazier.

But he found he was taking on too much, too soon.

He was unanimously outpointed and his unbeaten record was gone.

In total, it took Ali four years and 17 fights before he reclaimed his title by knocking out George Foreman in the Rumble in the Jungle.

Foreman took much longer to regain a version of the crown.

It was seven years and 29 fights after he came back following a ten-year retirement before he KO’d Michael Moorer.

No-one can blame Fury for taking the chance he has been offered, one that has put Joshua’s nose out of joint without a blow being landed.

Even if he should lose to Wilder it won’t lessen the box-office appeal of a domestic grudge-match with Joshua.

And if he should return from the US with the WBC belt, AJ and his promoter, Eddie Hearn, who have refused a Wilder fight, would take some time scraping the egg off their faces too.

With the ever-enigmatic Fury it is always the tale of the unexpected.

He says that in his mind he is the best heavyweight who ever lived.

Those of us fortunate enough to have witnessed Ali, Joe Frazier, George Foreman, Sonny Liston, Larry Holmes and Lennox Lewis in their prime or at their peak would stoutly demur.

But should he surmount Mission Impossible and unseat both Wilder then Joshua as comfortably as he did Klitschko, then he certainly would be hailed as the greatest heavyweight of his time, and rightly so.

Republished with permission from insidethegames.biz

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.